Emanuella Vs Mark Angel Video You Tube As A Media To Teach Listening Comprehension ; Its Opportunities And Drawbacks

theresia budi sucihati



The objectives of this research are to know whether: (1) The students’ attitudes towards the use of Emanuella vs Mark Angel video as a media to teach listening comprehension, (2) Emanuella vs Mark Angel video as a media to teach listening comprehension is useful for the students in enhancing their listening comprehension, (3) The students’ and lecturers’ perception towards the use of Emanuella vs Mark Angel video as a media to teach listening comprehension (4) The advantages and disadvantages of using emanuella vs mark angel video you tube to teach listening comprehension.

This research employs descriptive study which is aimed to describe, explain, and validate the findings. The data collection methods will be observation, questionnaire, and interview. There will be four instruments namely observation checklist, open-ended questionnaire, and interview guidelines. The action will be done in this research is playing Emanuella Vs Mark Angel video  you tube as media in teaching and learning listening.

It is hoped that the completion of this research will provide an innovative media in teaching listening comprehension students of university level. This learning model is expected to improve the quality of learning. If the role of lecturers increase, the students will have a better English.


Keywords : Emanuella Vs Mark Angel Video, Listening Comprehension, Opportunities and Drawbacks.


Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assesment Principles and Classroom Practice. Cambridge: Longman

Brown, Lewis; Harcleorad. (1977). Technology and Media Method. New York: mc Graw hill Book Company

Harb, J., Bakar,Nadzrah A., and Krish, P. (2013).Instructors’ and students’ perceptions towards using technology in teaching and learning listening

Harmer, J. (2001).The Practice of English Language Teaching (third ed.). New York: Longman.

Jean Brewster and Gail Allis. (2003). The Primary English Teacher’s Guide. Harlow: Penguin English

Kemp, J.E. (1963). Planning and Producing Audiovisual Material. New York: Chandler Publishing Company

Madsa, Taksuriya. (2012). Motivating students’ speaking skill through simulation in English for specific purposes.1st Mae FahLuang University International Conference Proceedings, 1-8.

McLellan, Hillary and Knupfer, Nancy N. Descriptive research methodologies.McLellan Wyatt Journal of Kansas State University.Retrieved on October 2, 2015.

Sulistyo, Gunadi H. (2000). Promoting College Students’ Academic Speaking Skills. Jakarta: LPTK ISPI

Richards, Jack C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, Jack C. (1990). Listening Comprehension. Approach Design, Procedure TESOL Quarterly 17 (2): 219-240


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.